Okay, so that’s update on the project, and now here’s some other adventures had and planned:
I went to Forum, one of the nicest clubs I’ve ever been in. Apparently, it was profiled on a reality show that traveled to various clubs across the globe. With palm bridges and trees and a second floor that looks like a jungle lodge it has an awesome tropical look and feel. And after all that dancing the tradition is to party until the morning and eat Adobo (a traditional soup from pork). I haven’t been able to make it to these wee hours of the morning yet, but it will happen soon. I’ve got to build up the partying capacities.
Peruvian cuisine in general though is awesome, even if I’m not a fan of the national dish, Civiche (no matter how long raw fish sits in lemon, it’s not cooked to me:P). Other typical dishes are a great change from Canadian food—which I consistently explain pretty much doesn’t exist beyond the realms of Kraft Dinner, Poutine, maple syrup and peanut butter-jelly sandwiches. Well maybe I like the Peruvian food even more considering my lack of skill in the kitchen, and those convenient university student “meals” I grew accustomed to.
There are some things that I want to do when I get back to school aside from become insanely busy with AIESEC infosessions. That is, I want to write an article or two in the Silhouette (the school newspaper) about urban and rural poverty. For this article, I plan to visit the pueblos jovenes on the edges of the city, and go to Ayaviri to observe first hand a rural development project Eithel is working on. Briefly, his is a project with the objective of improving the livelihoods of dairy farmers in Ayaviri through various forms of support (financial, political and technological). Right now, he’s beginning a research proposal that’s being entered into a contest for more funding. Muy chevere y es un proyecto muy necesario!
And on a final note, Monday, I was witness to protests in the street over free trade (that’s the pic). Farmers are worried their livelihoods will be ruined through subsidized US agricultural products dumped onto their market, and some people may end up suffering from patent laws that are ratified by loosing access to cheap life-saving medicines (there are 76 000 Peruvians with HIV/AIDS that depend on cheap retrovirals). Oxfam, these protestors, and MSF (Medecines san Frontiers), are just three groups that are opposed to this move. On the other hand, from the upper-middle class people I’ve talked with, they don’t seem to have as many concerns over it. Also there’s the argument that a lot of the protesting might have an ideological, anti-US, anti-capitalist component. I agree that is probably a factor, but can you blame these poor people. Just look at the history of US involvement in Latin America!
Even being here, it’s hard to understand the reality. However, I’m trying to make time to understand this situation because one of Oxfam’s arguments is that sustainable development will be undermined because the government will have decreased negotiating capacities with companies. In other words, the government will find it difficult to impose environmental regulations and get companies to give back meaningfully to their communities. The TLC is the current macroeconomic context my project will be affected by. In a way it reminds me of the power of macroeconomic reforms on the lives of people. What I am wondering is if one macroeconomic decision can undermine the effects of NGOs and governments to invest in their poor populations. What I will say is that surely there are vulnerable groups that the government better have an extraordinary plan for that they will remain committed to if the TLC (Free Trade Agreement en español) goes into effect. So far I only see that vulnerable people are being thrown some money: Agricultural Minister Manuel Manrique says $36 million will be gong to agriculture sectors during the first year the trade deal goes into effect.
Here’s the Oxfam document on the TLC:
http://www.citizenstrade.org/pdf/oxfam_perufactsheet.pdf , here’s an article from the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5125852.stm and here’s CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/06/28/peru.trade.ap/index.html